MSPA Wiki:Votes for Featured Articles

On this page, you may nominate and vote on articles to be the wiki's next Featured Article.
 * To nominate an article, simply write your nomination under the Nominees section and sign your post. A nomination is equal to a vote, and it's one nomination per person.
 * To vote, simply sign with # ~ under the nominees to indicate your support. You can vote for up to two nominees at a time. You can change votes to another nominee at any time, until the selection date.
 * Voting may only begin once there are at least three nominees.
 * You can comment on the nominees in the designated section, but be warned that any claims of supporting a nominee do not count until you sign under the nominees section.

Here are some things to consider when nominating: Is the article detailed and easily comprehensible? Does it have any red links or links to redirects or disambig pages? If so, can these links be fixed? Does the article have a good number of images? Enough to be illustrative, but not too many. Does it look tidy?

If your article has any problems with the above criteria, please either refrain from nominating it, or make improvements to bring the quality up to a better standard. Remember that the Featured Article is representing the best this wiki has to offer, not just a popularity contest.

July 2012

 * Circumstantial simultaneity – Justification relegated to comments due to length


 * Grist – Very informative, and looks pretty damn nice to boot


 * Doc Scratch – massive amount of info, main charecter as well Chezrush 22:00, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments
Okay, so, my nominations. Yes, I know it says right there "one nomination per person". Making an exception here, just to kick things off. For circumstantial simultaneity, okay, yeah, I'm possibly biased, because I wrote almost all of it, but hear me out. It may not be a very long article, but it's concise and I think illustrates the concept reasonably well (especially given that the concept is stated to be not fully comprehensible). It's also a good example of an article that has exactly the right number of images. Could it have more added? Probably. Does it need more? Nope Comments edited due to having cleaned up the Grist page, 20:18, May 31, 2012 (UTC)