Talk:God Cat

Jaspers Connection = baseless speculation
So yesterday I edited the page (as 98.149.115.86, then later as this name), and in addition to adding the Name section, I replaced a lot of speculation that had been worked into the article with all this "it is not known whether..." and "It is currently unknown if..." or however it's worded. It covers what was suggested in the speculation, for instance how GCat may be related to Jaspers/Mutie. Lalonde throwing a blue-ambered mutie through a fenestrated wall doesn't connect GCat with Mutie. I can't think of anything else which might be construed as connecting GCat with Mutie or Jaspers. Who are different entities anyway. So I left it:


 * It is currently unknown what GCat's true feelings, motivations, or agendas may be, with regard to Jane or anyone else. Nor has its origin story been revealed, such as the way that Bec is related to HALLEY, or Doc Scratch is related to LIL' CAL and the MAGIC CUE BALL.

But about a half hour later theLight6 edited it to say this:


 * It is currently unknown what GCat's true feelings, motivations, or agendas may be, with regard to Jane or anyone else. Nor has its origin story been revealed, such as the way that Bec is related to HALLEY, or Doc Scratch is related to LIL' CAL and the MAGIC CUE BALL. However it may be somehow related to JASPERS (and therefore MUTIE).

'm not mad, but does anyone really think this claim is worth having the paragraph contradict itself? I appreciate TheLight6's creation of the page and continued maintenance of it; the flip side is I don't want to edit his/her spurious claim out because he/she will probably just edit it back. So, what does popular opinion feel?

SurpriseInside 03:24, January 5, 2012 (UTC)