Talk:Mythological roles/Title table

Suggestions
I'm not sure about aspects, either stick with the pairings or go with byb's Aspect Wheel? But as for classes, whenever the passive/active scale is fully revealed, we should arrange it by that as opposed to how it's currently arranged (which are my predictions for class pairings, sorry about kinda sneakily doing that.) Aepokk Venset 06:37, January 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well a wheel doesn't translate well to a linear line and could just come off as lacking rhyme and reason, also I really want Time and Space to be kept next to each other. So I say stick with aspect pairs and whatnot. As for the classes, before you rearranged them the canon passive/active pairs were together and the rest were mostly random. However I think it would be more useful to stick with pairings than to change to the scale. However that doesn't mean the scale (if it is ever revealed) can't be used to help sort it. There are multiple schools of thought on how the scale might exist; a mirror scale where the least passive (+1) is paired with the least active (-1) and so on and so forth until the most passive (Muse / +7) is paired with the most active (Lord / -7). In this case the +1/-1 pairing could be first and than work down to +7/-7. Than there is the more popular sliding scale and the least popular hybrid scale (though since the master classes already exist in a mirror format, a "pure" sliding scale is already a hybrid scale, the difference between the two is whether any standard classes are mirror pairs or not). In a sliding scale we could have +1/-6 first and than work down +6/-1 before finishing it off with +7/-7. As for a hybrid scale... Well I guess we can work that one out if is ever revealed to be true.
 * {| border=1 cellpadding=0 align="center" style="text-align: center" width="100%"

!Scale !Mirror pairs !Sliding pairs
 * +Potential Class orders (displayed horizontally instead of vertically to save space)
 * - valign="bottom"
 * Muse (+7)
 * +6
 * +5
 * +4
 * +3
 * +2
 * +1
 * -1
 * -2
 * -3
 * -4
 * -5
 * -6
 * Lord (-7)
 * +1
 * -1
 * +2
 * -2
 * +3
 * -3
 * +4
 * -4
 * +5
 * -5
 * +6
 * -6
 * Muse (+7)
 * Lord (-7)
 * +1
 * -6
 * +2
 * -5
 * +3
 * -4
 * +4
 * -3
 * +5
 * -2
 * +6
 * -1
 * Muse (+7)
 * Lord (-7)
 * }
 * - The Light6 (talk) 07:23, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I like those ideas. I'll keep this in mind should it ever be addressed, and take it upon myself to rearrange the table accordingly. Aepokk Venset 07:36, January 19, 2013 (UTC)